Who will blink first?

Does Barak Obama really believe he can "talk" the leader of Iran (a long-time narcissist and psychotic with delusions of grandeur) out of following through with his plans? Because if Baa-aa-rock does believe that, then that may be strong evidence that Obama is even more narcissistic and has even greater (more irrational) delusions than Mr. Cooky Iran Man does.

By the way, don't get distracted by North Korea's cooky man, Kim Jong Il. His recent threats are just attempts to gain concessions of oil and other needed supplies for his government and for his country in general. He appears to be playing from the Muhamar Kadafi and Saddam Hussein play books: bluster, huff, make threats, and then accept bribes to shut up and go away for a little while. So, don't let "the Il-man" distract you from the real danger: the psycho in Tehran. The real psycho has expressed his intentions many times and will soon (perhaps by the end of this calendar year) have the means to realize those intentions (to "annihilate Israel" and "bring America to its knees".) President "I'm-a-dinner-jacket" has consistently asserted that "the nuclear question is closed", as far as he is concerned. He is not going to stop building up his nuclear capabilities just because Baa-aa-rock wants to play a soccer game.

My opinion is that Kim Jong Il is blowin' more smoke, as he has been known to do from time to time. Il seems to have a personality disorder with borderline traits that makes him likely to threaten to do extremely crazy things ... until he finally gets the level of attention he seeks from whomever he seeks it. Obviously, his parents neglected him as he was growing up, and his adult life is one long attempt to get the attention (and respect - a form of love) that his parents never gave to him. He might blow up something (or someone) in the China Sea, but he will quickly calm down after that and then withdraw back into his basement playroom for the duration.

In Iran, on the other hand, Mahmood I'm-a-dinner-jacket seems to have evil principles giving structure to his grandiose thought processes. He seems to have darkness as his guide and death to Israeli and American societies as the primary objectives in his life. He does not seem to be merely posturing or posing like so many other world figures do in these kinds of mutual exchanges of threats and warnings. Mr. I'm-a-dinner-jacket does not waiver from his long held position. He just keeps moving forward toward his stated goals, while the rest of us do nothing to stop him from reaching those goals. And he will probably reach them in the very near future (within a year or two).

What is Baa-aa-rock planning to do? Play soccer until "the Dinner-jacket" has a fully functional nuclear weapon ready to launch... with his psychotic fingers twitching with glee on the launch code buttons before he takes effective action? Somehow that does not seem like a good end-game strategy Baa-aa-rock! And if we beat them in that soccer game? You don't think that will just tick them off even more?

So let's do the difficult thing now, because what is difficult now may be impossible later ... Let's act NOW to reduce I'm-a-dinner-jacket's ability to "bring America to its knees". Later might be a little too late. All we have to do is keep our mouths shut except to express full support for the Isrealis, and then either help them or stay out of their way when the time comes. And after Isreal does its thing -- that thing that none of the rest of us have the courage to do, we can do our usual thing in response (publicly condemn Israel, while privately patting them on their collective backs for having the cahones to do what needed to be done). But we will all be quietly relieved and grateful when the Isreali Air Force effectively relieves Iran of its nuclear capabilities. All of us. Including the most vehement and far left critics. They just won't be honest enough to admit it.